<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:activity="http://activitystrea.ms/spec/1.0/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Newsvine - David-2308845's Column - Articles and Seeds</title><link>http://David2308845.newsvine.com/</link><description>Think...and be enlightened.</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:36:51 +0000</pubDate><generator>http://www.newsvine.com</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>Common sense missing in deficit discussions?</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I write this with the objective of being, well, objective.
Our leaders believe they will avert the current "fiscal crisis" by increasing our deficit (borrowing) by 2.4 trillion, but at the same time "cutting" the budget by 2.4 trillion.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David-2308845]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[David-2308845]]></source><link>http://David2308845.newsvine.com/_news/2011/07/30/7200695-common-sense-missing-in-deficit-discussions</link><guid>http://David2308845.newsvine.com/_news/2011/07/30/7200695-common-sense-missing-in-deficit-discussions</guid><category>congress</category><category>budget</category><category>politics</category><category>deficit</category><category>debt</category><category>ceiling</category><category>trillion</category><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:40:13 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/generic_post</activity:object-type></item></channel></rss>
